small comment that seems that DW_OP_GNU_entry_value does something that

DW_OP_entry_value
This commit is contained in:
2020-01-16 12:34:02 +04:00
parent 132e0d3854
commit eadbe9a80a
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ dwarf_op_map op_map[] = {
{DW_OP_implicit_value, "DW_OP_implicit_value", dw_op_notimpl}, {DW_OP_implicit_value, "DW_OP_implicit_value", dw_op_notimpl},
{DW_OP_stack_value, "DW_OP_stack_value", dw_op_stack_value}, {DW_OP_stack_value, "DW_OP_stack_value", dw_op_stack_value},
// in fact, implementation is at upper layer since this operation contains sub-expression // in fact, implementation is at upper layer since this operation contains sub-expression
{DW_OP_GNU_entry_value, "DW_OP_GNU_entry_value", dw_op_notimpl}, {DW_OP_GNU_entry_value, "DW_OP_GNU_entry_value", dw_op_notimpl}, // seems that it's equal to DW_OP_entry_value
}; };
int find_regnum(uint32_t op) int find_regnum(uint32_t op)